In Switzerland, condominium ownership (PPE) is a special form of co-ownership in which several people have exclusive rights to certain parts of a building, while sharing ownership of the common parts. This legal system, codified in articles 712a to 712t of the Swiss Civil Code, offers a pragmatic solution to the desire for home ownership in a country where land is scarce and expensive. The PPE combines the advantages of individual ownership with those of collective management of a property. Faced with urban densification and changing lifestyles, this legal arrangement is enjoying growing success, but raises complex governance and management issues that require a thorough understanding of the Swiss legal framework.
Condominium ownership in Switzerland is based on a precise legal framework, mainly defined by the Swiss Civil Code. Introduced in its modern form in 1965, condominium ownership is governed by articles 712a to 712t of the Civil Code, which lay down the fundamental principles of this form of ownership.
According to article 712a CC, the PPE is defined as a particular form of co-ownership of a building, giving each co-owner the exclusive right to use and develop specific parts of the building. This definition highlights the characteristic duality of the PPE: on the one hand, an exclusive right of ownership over a private part, and on the other, a co-ownership share in the common parts.
The legal structure of the PPE comprises two fundamental elements:
This distinction is fundamental, as it determines the rights and obligations of each co-owner. Under Swiss law, private portions are subject to exclusive ownership rights, while common portions belong to all co-owners in proportion to their shares.
Each co-owner’s share is expressed in thousandths or as a percentage of the total value of the building. It determines not only the share of common expenses, but also the weight of each owner in collective decisions.
A PPE can be set up in several ways:
In all cases, the deed establishing the PPE must be authenticated and entered in the land register. It must contain a precise description of the private and common parts, as well as the determination of the quotas of each co-owner.
The legal validity of the PPE depends on compliance with these formalities. Swiss law attaches particular importance to the precision of the deeds of incorporation, as they will serve as a reference in the event of subsequent disputes between co-owners.
The flexibility of the Swiss legal framework means that the PPE structure can be adapted to the specific needs of each building, while guaranteeing legal certainty for all co-owners. This adaptability is one of the strengths of the Swiss system, which has evolved to meet the contemporary challenges of collective ownership.
Life in a condominium requires a structured organization to ensure efficient management of the common areas and collective decision-making. Swiss law provides a precise framework for the organization and operation of the condominium community.
The General Meeting is the supreme body of the PPE. It brings together all co-owners and has the most extensive decision-making powers. According to article 712m of the Civil Code, the general meeting must be held at least once a year, but extraordinary meetings can be convened if necessary.
The powers of the General Meeting are numerous and include :
Decision-making at the Annual General Meeting is governed by precise rules. The Swiss Civil Code distinguishes between several types of decisions requiring different majorities:
This gradation in majority requirements reflects the importance of the decisions to be taken, and is designed to protect individual interests while enabling efficient management of the whole.
The administrator plays a central role in the day-to-day running of the PPE. Appointed by the General Meeting, he or she may be a co-owner or an external professional. The administrator’s duties are defined by law and set out in the administration regulations.
The director’s main responsibilities include :
Directors must report on their management to the Annual General Meeting at least once a year. Directors may be held liable in the event of misconduct in the performance of their duties.
A fundamental document in condominium life, the administration and use regulations set out the rights and obligations of condominium owners. They complement legal provisions and adapt general rules to the specific features of each building.
These regulations generally cover the following aspects:
To be enforceable against third parties, in particular successive purchasers of lots, the regulations must be entered in the land register. This formality gives the by-laws particular legal force, and ensures their continuity beyond changes of ownership.
The organization and operation of the community of co-owners in Switzerland is based on a subtle balance between collective autonomy and the protection of individual rights. This structured framework helps prevent many conflicts and facilitates the resolution of those that do arise.
In a condominium, each co-owner has a set of rights, but must also respect certain obligations. This balance, meticulously regulated by Swiss law, aims to harmonize collective life while preserving individual prerogatives.
The owner of a PPE share enjoys extensive rights over his or her private area. In accordance with article 712a of the Civil Code, they are free to use, develop and transform their private space, subject to compliance with legal and regulatory limits.
The main rights of co-owners include :
These rights are exercised within a framework determined by law, the constituting act and the administration regulations. They may be subject to restrictions, notably to preserve the structural integrity of the building or the legitimate interests of other co-owners.
A particular aspect of Swiss law concerns the legal right of pre-emption (art. 712c CC). Unless otherwise stipulated in the by-laws, each co-owner has a pre-emptive right to any shares offered for sale in the building. This mechanism enables existing co-owners to have priority in acquiring new shares, thereby strengthening the cohesion of the community.
In return for these rights, the co-owner is subject to a number of obligations designed to preserve harmony within the community and guarantee the long-term future of the building.
The main obligations include :
One of the central obligations concerns common expenses. Article 712h CC stipulates that each co-owner contributes to the common administrative expenses, taxes and other charges for the building as a whole, as well as to the costs of maintenance, repair and restoration of the common areas, works, installations and equipment.
While the freedom to dispose of one’s share is a fundamental principle, Swiss law nevertheless provides for certain restrictions designed to protect the community of co-owners.
These limitations include :
These mechanisms preserve the balance of the community while respecting the fundamental right of ownership. They illustrate the constant search for a compromise between individual and collective interests that characterizes the PPE system in Switzerland.
Together, these rights and obligations form a coherent system that has proved its worth in practice. The clarity of the legal framework helps to reduce potential sources of conflict, and facilitates the resolution of those that do arise.
The financial dimension is a fundamental aspect of condominium management. Swiss law establishes a precise framework for distributing expenses, setting aside reserves and carrying out work, to ensure the long-term future of the property and fairness between co-owners.
In principle, common expenses are divided between co-owners in proportion to their share. However, article 712h of the Swiss Civil Code allows this distribution key to be adapted in certain cases, notably when certain facilities benefit some co-owners more than others.
Common expenses generally include :
Each year, the administrator draws up a provisional budget, which must be approved by the general meeting. On this basis, he determines the instalments to be paid periodically by each co-owner. An annual statement then adjusts the situation to reflect actual expenditure.
To ensure sound financial management, the administrator must keep rigorous and transparent accounts. Co-owners have the right to consult supporting documents and may request explanations of expenditure items.
The renovation fund is an indispensable financial tool for dealing with the major work required on any building over time. Although its creation is not mandatory under Swiss law, it is highly recommended and generally provided for in the by-laws.
This fund enables :
The size of the fund depends on a number of factors, including the age and condition of the building, as well as foreseeable medium- and long-term work. Specialists generally recommend an annual payment of between 0.2% and 0.5% of the replacement value of the building.
The renovation fund is legally considered as common property of the co-owners. In the event of the sale of a lot, the seller cannot claim reimbursement of his share of the fund, which remains attached to the building.
Swiss law distinguishes between several categories of work, each subject to different decision-making rules:
For large-scale projects, the procedure generally involves several stages:
Long-term work planning is a good practice recommended for condominiums. A multi-year maintenance plan enables you to anticipate needs and spread expenditure rationally, thus avoiding the often more costly emergency situations.
The financial management and execution of work in a condominium requires a methodical and transparent approach. The Swiss legal framework provides the tools needed to reconcile the preservation of property assets with respect for the interests of each co-owner.
Life in a condominium can generate tensions and disagreements between the various parties involved. Swiss law provides various mechanisms for preventing and resolving such conflicts, giving priority to amicable solutions without neglecting legal recourse when necessary.
Conflicts in the EPP can take many forms, and involve many different players. A general distinction is made between :
These disputes may concern legal issues (interpretation of regulations, validity of an assembly decision), financial issues (distribution of charges, cost of work) or technical issues (quality of work, maintenance of installations).
Prevention is the best approach when faced with the risk of litigation. Several measures can be taken to reduce potential sources of conflict:
The role of the administrator is crucial in this preventive approach. By acting as an intermediary, he or she can defuse emerging tensions and encourage dialogue between the parties.
When a conflict arises despite preventive measures, Swiss law favors amicable approaches before legal recourse.
Amicable resolution mechanisms include :
These methods offer a number of advantages: they are generally quicker and less costly than legal proceedings, preserve relations between co-owners and enable tailor-made solutions to be found.
If amicable resolution fails, there are several legal remedies available, depending on the nature of the dispute:
Territorial jurisdiction generally lies with the court in the place where the property is located. The applicable procedure varies according to the value in dispute and the nature of the conflict.
In the most serious cases, involving repeated breaches of the regulations or chronic non-payment of charges, the community can request the exclusion of a co-owner. This exceptional measure, provided for in article 649b CC, requires a court decision and results in the forced sale of the offending co-owner’s share.
Given the complexity of condominium law, the involvement of specialized professionals is often crucial to the effective resolution of conflicts. A lawyer specializing in real estate law can assist co-owners or the community at various stages:
In-depth knowledge of the legal framework and case law relating to PEPs enables the lawyer to guide his client towards the strategy best suited to his particular situation.
Conflict resolution in PPE is thus based on a balance between amicable approaches and legal recourse. The Swiss legal system offers a structured framework that favors consensual solutions while guaranteeing the protection of individual rights when dialogue proves insufficient.
The system of condominium ownership in Switzerland, although established on solid foundations, is undergoing significant changes to adapt to contemporary realities. These changes affect both the legal framework and management practices, and respond to broader societal concerns.
The energy transition represents a major challenge for Swiss condominiums. The legal requirements for energy efficiency are becoming increasingly stringent, notably with the Energy Strategy 2050 and the various cantonal regulations.
This transition takes several forms:
These transformations raise complex legal issues for PPE: the decision-making process for works, cost allocation, modifications to common areas to install energy equipment. Recent case law tends to facilitate these changes by relaxing certain majority requirements for energy-related work.
Faced with these challenges, new financing methods are emerging, such as energy performance contracts and specific subsidies for condominiums. These mechanisms make it possible to spread the financial effort over time and optimize the return on investment of energy-related work.
A significant proportion of Switzerland’s condominiums were built in the 1970s and 1980s, during the first boom in this type of ownership. Today, these buildings are reaching an age that requires major renovation.
This situation gives rise to several problems:
Experience shows that many PPEs have not sufficiently anticipated these needs. Recent studies show that renovation funds are often underfunded in relation to actual needs, creating a risk of gradual deterioration of the property portfolio.
To address this issue, specific financial planning tools for PPE are being developed, enabling better anticipation of needs. Some cantons are considering regulatory measures to encourage more adequate allocation of renovation funds.
The digital revolution is gradually transforming condominium management practices in Switzerland. This evolution can be seen in several innovations:
These innovations raise new legal issues, notably concerning the validity of decisions taken electronically and the protection of co-owners’ personal data. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this digital transition, with the development of remote general meetings.
Swiss law is gradually adapting to these developments, with case law clarifying the conditions for the validity of virtual assemblies and electronic voting. Some cantons have already amended their legislation to facilitate these practices.
Spatial planning policy in Switzerland aims to limit urban sprawl and encourages the densification of existing built-up areas. This orientation has direct implications for EPPs:
These projects raise complex legal issues concerning the rights of existing co-owners, the modification of quotas, and the distribution of the value created. Recent case law tends to clarify the conditions under which such transformations can be carried out.
In this context, legal expertise becomes indispensable for navigating between the different layers of legislation: federal condominium law, cantonal planning regulations and municipal building bylaws. A specialized law firm can provide effective support to condominium owners facing these issues, offering an integrated analysis of the various legal dimensions.
These recent developments show that the PPE system in Switzerland, far from being set in stone, continues to adapt to societal and technological transformations. Its intrinsic flexibility, combined with the legal certainty it offers, explains its enduring popularity as a means of home ownership in a Swiss real estate context characterized by scarcity and high costs.
An initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take stock of your situation with a specialist lawyer.
Would you just like to make an appointment to ask a few questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide whether you wish to proceed, and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments can be made in person or by videoconference.
by calling our secretariat or filling in the form below.
Appointments in person or by videoconference.
© All rights reserved – Reproduction prohibited – 2025 – Legal Notice