Seizure, as part of debt enforcement in Switzerland, is a coercive measure designed to secure assets belonging to the debtor, in order to guarantee payment of recognized claims. This essential step takes place after the creditor has obtained an enforceable title, such as a court decision or an undisputed acknowledgement of debt. It is clearly distinct from the realization phase, which takes place at a later stage and involves converting seized assets into cash to pay off creditors. In Switzerland, the debt collection office plays a central role in this procedure, acting as both arbitrator and executor. This inherently impartial body ensures that the rights of the parties involved are respected, while guaranteeing the transparency and legality of the measures taken. In Geneva, cantonal specificities include the use of electronic platforms to speed up the transmission of information and guarantee efficient and proportionate seizure.
The debt enforcement office acts as the main authority in the execution of the seizure. Its mission includes identifying seizable assets, implementing security measures, and managing interactions between the various parties. Office agents are empowered to access the debtor’s financial information, notably via banking institutions, and to order third-party verifications where necessary. In addition, they must ensure a balance between the interests of the creditor and the protection of the debtor’s rights, in particular by preserving the minimum subsistence level. In Geneva, the office benefits from advanced IT systems that centralize data and facilitate collaboration with creditors and other institutions. The office must also ensure that the legal deadlines for each stage of the procedure are respected, failing which the acts carried out will be null and void.
Seizure and realization of assets are two distinct but complementary stages in the debt recovery procedure. Whereas seizure is limited to immobilizing the debtor’s assets, realization consists in selling or liquidating them in order to pay off creditors. In Switzerland, seizure confers on creditors a preferential right over identified assets, but this right remains subordinate to the realization procedure. This distinction is particularly important in cases where seized assets are subject to claims or disputes, thereby prolonging the time required before they can be put up for sale. Assets that cannot be seized, such as those guaranteeing a minimum standard of living, remain outside the scope of this procedure, even in the case of substantial debts. In Geneva, consultations with the office often help to clarify this separation, reducing misunderstandings and disputes between the parties.
The canton of Geneva stands out for its specific adaptations to the foreclosure procedure, particularly with regard to the use of digital tools and interactions between the various parties. Foreclosure management is simplified thanks to online platforms, enabling creditors to follow the progress of their case in real time and file the necessary documents. Geneva also imposes strict transparency in the management of seized assets, with detailed reports provided by the debt-collection office at every stage. Procedural deadlines are also adapted to take account of local realities, such as the availability of courts and valuation experts. Finally, the canton favours amicable solutions before proceeding with the realization of assets, thus offering a less costly and less conflictual alternative for the parties concerned.
Not all assets belonging to the debtor are subject to seizure. Swiss law makes a clear distinction between seizable assets, such as bank accounts and valuable movable property, and non-seizable assets, which include items necessary for subsistence and the exercise of a professional activity. This distinction is based on the principle of protection of the minimum subsistence level, guaranteeing the debtor a decent livelihood. In addition, certain assets can be partially seized, such as vehicles used for mixed purposes or pension funds under certain conditions. Creditors must work closely with the debt-collection office to identify suitable assets, while respecting the restrictions imposed by law. In Geneva, specific guidelines govern the seizure of complex assets, such as unlisted shares or copyrights, often requiring additional expert appraisals.
Assets may be exempt from seizure either absolutely or relatively, depending on their nature and function. Absolutely unseizable assets include personal effects, essential work tools and social benefits, which are fully protected by law. Conversely, relatively unseizable assets, such as a debtor’s income, may be subject to partial seizure according to specific rules. For example, wages can be seized up to the amount exceeding the minimum subsistence level. This approach ensures a balance between the creditor’s right to recover its debts and the need to preserve the debtor’s dignity. In the canton of Geneva, rigorous checks are carried out to ensure that the amounts seized respect these limits, and debtors can contest any assessment deemed excessive or incorrect.
Wage garnishment is a common debt collection procedure, enabling the creditor to directly collect part of the debtor’s income. This measure is strictly regulated, with a precise calculation of the amount that can be seized based on the subsistence minimum. Employers play a key role in this procedure, deducting the amounts directly from the debtor’s wages and transferring them to the debt collection office. Failure to do so can result in sanctions, including fines. In addition, wage garnishment can be revised if the debtor’s financial situation changes, as in the case of a reduction in income or an increase in family expenses. In Geneva, digital tools facilitate communication between employers, debtors and the debt collection office, ensuring greater transparency and speed in the processing of cases.
The order and scope of seizure are defined by legal priorities, ensuring that the most readily realizable assets are seized first. For example, cash and bank accounts are generally given priority over real estate, due to their immediate availability. The extent of the seizure depends on the total value of the recognized claims, and the office must take care not to seize assets exceeding this amount. However, in complex cases involving several creditors, adjustments may be necessary to respect the rights of each. In Geneva, practices include the use of specialized software to optimize priority management and avoid conflicts between creditors. This approach ensures a fair and proportionate seizure, reducing the risk of protracted disputes between the parties.
The seizure procedure is a regulated operation that begins with a request from a creditor, accepted by the debt-collection office. This request specifies the nature of the goods to be seized, and is accompanied by supporting documents such as an acknowledgement of debt or a court decision. Once this stage has been completed, the debt-collection office issues a seizure notice, which is sent to the debtor. This notice, which is crucial to the procedure, specifies the assets to be seized and the timetable for operations. At this stage, the debtor is legally obliged to cooperate, in particular by disclosing information about his assets. Failure to do so may result in sanctions, including coercive measures such as home visits or bank account seizures. Finally, a seizure report is drawn up by the office to list the assets seized, as this document has evidential value for further proceedings. The law also requires the office to ensure that the seizure is proportionate, and does not exceed what is necessary to cover the recognized claims.
The notice of seizure is an essential legal document in the procedure. This document, issued by the debt-collection office, formally informs the debtor of the assets seized and details the obligations incumbent upon him. The debtor must provide the debt-collection office with complete and truthful information on the composition of his assets. Any refusal or concealment may be construed as fraudulent evasion of the debtor’s claim, an act liable to consequences. In addition, this notice is also communicated to relevant third parties, such as banks, to ensure the effective immobilization of the debtor’s financial assets. In complex proceedings, where the ownership of assets may be disputed, the office may call in independent experts to determine the nature and value of the assets. In Geneva, information obligations also include the use of electronic tools for rapid transmission of data, which enhances the efficiency and transparency of the procedure.
To ensure that seized goods remain available until they are realized, various security measures are applied. These include the sealing of material assets, the freezing of bank funds and a prohibition on disposal. These measures are reinforced by regular checks carried out by the debt enforcement office. In addition, several creditors may participate in the same seizure procedure, subject to compliance with deadlines and presentation of the required supporting documents. This participation is governed by the priority rules established by debt collection law, which define the order in which claims will be satisfied. Creditors may also contest decisions taken by the office, particularly in the event of disagreement over the valuation or identification of assets. This collective dimension of the seizure, while beneficial to creditors, can prolong the procedure and increase its complexity.
Seizure deadlines are strictly regulated by law. Once the notice of seizure has been issued, the debtor has a limited time in which to contest the measures or apply for suspension on legitimate grounds. Creditors, for their part, must act within the allotted time to assert their rights and ensure that their claims are included in the procedure. In terms of costs, the debt collection office charges fees to cover administrative and operational costs. These costs, calculated on the basis of the value of the assets seized, are advanced by the creditors, but can be recovered when the assets are realized. In Geneva, expert fees for the valuation of certain assets, such as works of art or complex assets, are also payable by creditors. Any delay or failure to meet deadlines can have serious consequences, such as forfeiture of the seizure or loss of the priority rights of the offending creditor.
An immediate and automatic consequence of seizure is the prohibition on disposing of seized assets. Once the assets have been identified, the debtor can no longer sell them, transfer them or use them as collateral for other claims. This prohibition, supervised by the debt-collection office, also extends to third parties with an interest in the assets, such as banks or co-owners. Any attempt to circumvent this prohibition is considered a criminal offence and may result in severe penalties, including the cancellation of fraudulent transactions. In Geneva, this prohibition is reinforced by the use of electronic registers, which allow real-time notification of the third parties concerned and limit the risk of abuse. In addition, creditors can ask the office to introduce additional measures, such as sequestration, to guarantee the preservation of seized assets.
For the debtor, seizure represents a significant attack on his assets, but Swiss law provides mechanisms to protect his fundamental rights. For example, certain goods essential to daily life or the exercise of a professional activity are excluded from seizure, in line with the principles of protection of the minimum subsistence level. In addition, the debtor can contest the seizure if he considers it disproportionate or flawed. In the event of abusive seizure, they can also claim damages against the office or the creditors involved. In Geneva, mediation platforms have been set up to enable debtors and creditors to find amicable solutions before taking legal action, offering a less costly and faster alternative.
Third parties, such as co-owners of a seized property or fund managers, can be directly affected by seizure proceedings. They are legally obliged to cooperate with the debt collection office and provide information on the assets concerned. For example, a bank must freeze the debtor’s accounts as soon as it receives the seizure notice, under penalty of sanctions. Creditors, for their part, must follow the procedure closely to ensure that their claims are recognized and given priority. They can also request expert appraisals to contest the valuation of assets, or initiate reclamation actions if they feel that certain assets belong to them. This complex dynamic calls for rigorous coordination on the part of the office to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure a fair distribution of funds.
Participation in a foreclosure enables several creditors to assert their rights in a joint procedure. This phase is governed by strict deadlines, during which creditors must file their claims accompanied by sufficient evidence, such as contracts or judgments. In the event of dispute, a validation procedure is organized to rule on the legitimacy of the claims. Validated creditors then participate in the distribution of the recovered funds, according to an order of priority defined by legislation. In Geneva, the debt-collection office plays a central role in this coordination, ensuring that claims are treated fairly. This stage may also include negotiations between the parties to avoid protracted litigation, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the procedure.
An initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take stock of your situation with a specialist lawyer.
Would you just like to make an appointment to ask a few questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide whether you wish to proceed, and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments can be made in person or by videoconference.
by calling our secretariat or filling in the form below.
Appointments in person or by videoconference.
© All rights reserved – Reproduction prohibited – 2025 – Legal Notice