The summons to pay is an official document issued by the debt-collection office, and is a decisive step in the debt-collection process in Switzerland.
Once the creditor has filed a requisition for debt collection, the debt collection office examines the request and, if it meets the legal requirements, issues an order to pay.
This document is then served on the debtor, formally informing him that a claim has been made against him.
The “commandement de payer” specifies the amount of the debt, the creditor’s contact details, and gives instructions for settling the debt or lodging an objection.
This document is fundamental, as it formalizes the debt and formally initiates the collection procedure.
The debtor has 20 days in which to lodge an opposition, during which time he or she can contest the validity of the claim or negotiate a settlement with the creditor.
The main purpose of the “commandement de payer” is to formally notify the debtor of the existence of the claim, and to offer him/her an opportunity to settle the debt or contest the claim.
From a legal point of view, the issuing of this document creates a legal obligation for the debtor to respond within a specific timeframe, generally 20 days.
If the debtor does not respond or object, the claim is deemed to be recognized, and the creditor can then seek compulsory enforcement measures, such as seizure of assets.
The summons to pay thus constitutes the starting point for subsequent legal action, consolidating the creditor’s position and structuring the rights and obligations of both parties.
In addition, the debtor’s failure to respond may enable the creditor to apply for a writ of default after the seizure procedure has been completed, if this does not enable the debt to be recovered in full.
Beyond its legal implications, the summons to pay has a significant psychological impact on the parties involved.
For the debtor, receiving an order to pay can be a source of stress and anxiety, as it means that the debt is now formalized and legal proceedings are underway.
This document often acts as a powerful pressure tactic, prompting the debtor to settle the debt to avoid further complications.
For the creditor, the issuance of a “commandement de payer” can reinforce confidence in the collection procedure and act as a lever to negotiate a rapid settlement of the debt.
The psychological dimension of this document should not be underestimated, as it can influence the behavior and decisions of both parties.
It is crucial for both creditors and debtors to develop effective strategies for managing and responding to an order to pay.
For the creditor, it is important to prepare complete and accurate documentation to justify the claim in the event of opposition from the debtor.
This includes keeping all relevant contracts, invoices and communications.
In addition, the creditor must be prepared to negotiate payment plans or compromises to avoid protracted and costly legal proceedings.
For the debtor, the first step is to carefully read the summons to pay and understand the options available.
If the claim is justified, it may be worth negotiating directly with the creditor to find an amicable solution.
If the claim is contested, the debtor must formulate a detailed objection and gather evidence to support his position.
The “commandement de payer” is a formal document issued by the Office des poursuites in Switzerland, which follows a standardized structure to ensure clarity and legal conformity.
The document begins with the official letterhead of the Office des poursuites, including the name and contact details of the office.
This is followed by a section giving the full names and addresses of the creditor and debtor.
This precise identification is crucial to avoid confusion and ensure that the document is directed to the right parties.
The next section details the amount of the claim in Swiss francs, including any interest and additional costs.
This part is essential, as it informs the debtor of the exact amount he has to pay.
Next, the summons to pay must specify the reason for the debt, often mentioned in the form of a description of the claim, such as an unpaid invoice, an outstanding loan or services rendered.
To be valid, a summons to pay must contain certain mandatory legal information.
These include a formal declaration that the claim is due and that legal action has been taken.
This declaration must be clear and precise to inform the debtor of the legal situation.
In addition, the document must include a reference to the legal deadlines, specifying the time the debtor has to react, usually 20 days from receipt of the summons.
Another important section is an explanation of the debtor’s rights, including the right to object to the claim.
This objection must be made in writing and submitted to the debt-collection office within the stipulated deadline.
The order to pay must also provide clear instructions on how to proceed with the opposition, including the contact details of the office where the opposition is to be lodged.
Each section of the summons to pay has specific legal implications.
The section on the amount of the claim and interest clarifies the creditor’s financial expectations and sets the stage for a possible amicable settlement or negotiation of the debt.
The description of the claim helps to contextualize the request and provide the debtor with a basis for understanding and possibly contesting the claim.
The mandatory legal information, on the other hand, lays the foundations for the debt collection procedure.
It informs the debtor of his rights and obligations, as well as the potential consequences of inaction, such as seizure of assets.
These sections of the document are designed to ensure that the debtor is fully informed of the situation and the possible next steps in the collection process.
The clarity and precision of a payment order are essential to guarantee its effectiveness and legal validity. Every element of the document must be clearly and unambiguously worded to avoid confusion or unnecessary dispute. The amount of the claim must be exact and detailed, including interest and additional costs, so that the debtor fully understands the extent of his debt. Similarly, the reason for the claim must be explained in an understandable way, providing sufficient context for the debtor to identify the source of the debt. In addition, precise instructions on how to lodge an objection and the exact contact details of the debt collection office help to avoid procedural errors that could complicate or delay the procedure. Precision and clarity in the payment order are therefore crucial to protecting the rights of all parties involved and ensuring a smooth and fair debt collection procedure.
Issuing a summons to pay in Switzerland is subject to strict formal conditions.
One of the first requirements is the territorial jurisdiction of the debt collection office.
As a general rule, the competent office is that of the debtor’s domicile.
This rule is designed to ensure that the debtor has easy access to the office for any questions or objections.
In the case of debtors with no fixed address or domiciled abroad, specific rules apply, such as the jurisdiction of the office in the place where the debtor’s assets are located in Switzerland.
In addition, the creditor must pay the debt collection costs at the time of the requisition.
These fees vary according to the amount of the claim, and cover the administrative costs associated with the procedure.
Payment of these fees is a prerequisite for issuing the summons to pay, thus ensuring that the office’s resources are used efficiently.
The debt-collection office has limited room for manoeuvre when it comes to analyzing the merits of the requisition for payment.
Unlike legal proceedings, where the merits of the case are examined, the debt-collection office does not check the validity of the claim at the time of issuing the summons to pay.
Its role is primarily administrative: it ensures that all the required information is present, and that formalities such as territorial jurisdiction and payment of fees are complied with.
However, the office must check that the requisition complies with the formal requirements of the law.
If essential elements are missing, or if the conditions are not met, the office may refuse to issue the summons to pay.
This formal check ensures that the procedure complies with the legal rules, without prejudging the validity of the claim.
Notification of the order to pay is a crucial step which must be carried out in accordance with strict conditions to guarantee the rights of the parties involved.
Notification must be made by hand to the debtor or to his home address, generally by an agent of the Debt Collection Office, or by registered mail.
The aim is to ensure that the debtor actually receives the document and takes cognizance of it.
The date of notification is also important, as it marks the start of legal deadlines for the debtor, in particular the 20-day period for lodging objections.
If the debtor is absent, notification by publication may be considered, but only as a last resort and subject to specific conditions.
Correct notification is essential to avoid any subsequent challenge to the validity of the proceedings, and to protect the debtor’s rights fairly.
Notification of the summons to pay has a direct impact on the calculation of time limits for opposition.
Once the summons to pay has been served, the debtor generally has 20 days in which to lodge an opposition.
This period begins to run on the day following actual notification of the document.
If the debtor lodges an opposition within this period, he/she is contesting the claim, and the debt collection procedure is suspended until the validity of the claim has been judged by a court.
If no objection is lodged within the time limit, the claim is deemed to be recognized, and the creditor can then apply for compulsory enforcement measures, such as seizure of the debtor’s assets.
Timeliness is therefore crucial, as it determines the next steps in the procedure and the rights of each party.
Proper and timely notification ensures that the legal proceedings are conducted fairly and in accordance with legal principles.
Receipt of a summons to pay has immediate and significant consequences for the debtor.
This official document means that the creditor has initiated legal proceedings to collect a debt.
From the date of receipt, the debtor must take swift action to avoid more serious legal consequences.
The summons to pay informs the debtor of the amount claimed, including any interest and costs, and specifies the legal deadline of 20 days to react.
This deadline is crucial, as any inaction on the part of the debtor may result in tacit acknowledgement of the debt, enabling the creditor to proceed with forced execution measures such as seizure of goods or blocking of bank accounts.
Notification of the summons to pay therefore marks the start of a critical period for the debtor, who must quickly assess his options and decide on the best course of action.
Faced with a summons to pay, the debtor has several options for reacting.
The first option is to pay the debt within the 20-day time limit.
By paying the sum claimed, the debtor puts an end to the legal proceedings and avoids further legal action.
If the debtor contests the validity or amount of the claim, he can lodge an opposition.
This objection must be made in writing and lodged with the debt collection office within the legal time limit.
Opposition suspends the debt collection procedure until the dispute has been resolved by a court of law.
Another option is for the debtor to lodge a complaint under the LP for procedural irregularities, if formal errors or abuse of rights are found in the issuing of the payment order.
In addition, the debtor can, of course, lodge an objection to the payment order.
If the debtor fails to react within 20 days, the payment order becomes legally binding, signifying that the claim is legally recognized.
This situation enables the creditor to request compulsory enforcement measures.
These include seizure of the debtor’s assets, freezing of bank accounts, or attachment of wages.
These actions are carried out by the Debt Enforcement Office, with the aim of recovering the sum owed by all available legal means.
An enforceable order to pay also has consequences for the debtor’s financial situation and reputation, including entry in the debt collection register, which may make it more difficult to obtain credit or other financing in the future.
The debtor must therefore be fully aware of the legal implications of inaction in the face of a summons to pay.
In the event of opposition by the debtor, the creditor has several options for asserting his rights.
He can apply to the competent court for a provisional or final discharge of the opposition.
Provisional release can be obtained quickly if the creditor presents clear written proof of the claim, such as a judgment or an acknowledgement of debt signed by the debtor.
Definitive release, on the other hand, requires a longer legal procedure, in which the court examines the arguments of both parties in detail before reaching a decision.
If the debtor fails to respond to the payment order, the creditor can immediately request enforcement measures.
In this case, the debt collection office will seize the debtor’s assets or take other steps to recover the debt.
These possibilities show how important it is for the debtor to react quickly and appropriately to avoid more restrictive measures.
An initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take stock of your situation with a specialist lawyer.
Would you just like to make an appointment to ask a few questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide whether you wish to proceed, and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case.
Appointments can be made in person or by videoconference.
Make an appointment now
by calling our secretariat or filling in the form below.
Appointments can be made in person or by videoconference.
+41 22 577 66 46